Search PinoyPress                                                                                                                                                       Subscribe       Follow us on

March 13, 2010                             Manila, Philippines
LATEST POSTS & UPDATES    |    NEWS & FEATURES    |    OPINION & ANALYSIS    |    SPECIAL REPORTS    |    PHOTOGRAPHS    |    VIDEO    |    PRESS RELEASES
Politics & Governance   |   Economy   |   Business   |   Human Rights   |   OFWs & Migration   |   Environment   |   Insurgency   |   Entertainment   |   Lifestyle   |   Technology

Court Says Arroyo and Her Men Liable for Abduction, Disappearance of Activist

PUBLISHED ON January 24, 2009 AT 7:52 AM ·

The National Union of People’s Lawyers, in a statement, described as a “bold decision” a Cordillera court’s decision finding “substantial evidence” to link President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and several of her men to the abduction and disappearance of activist James Balao.

The NUPL’s statement reads in full:

In a bold decision promulgated on January 19, 2009, the first on the writ of amparo in the Cordillera Region, the Regional Trial Court-Branch 63 in La Trinidad, Benguet found substantial evidence to link President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita, Defense Secretary Gilbert Teodoro, Interior Secretary Ronaldo Puno, National Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales, AFP Chief of Staff Gen. Alexander Yano, PNP Chief Jesus Versoza, Brig. Gen. Reynaldo Mapagu, P/Dir. Edgardo Doromal, Maj. Gen. Isagani Cachuela and Senior Supreintendent Eugene Martin, to the abduction and continued disappearance of activist James Balao. These government officials were the respondents in a petition for the issuance of the writ of amparo filed by the family and co-workers of James Balao in September 2008. Judge Benigno M. Galacgac penned the Decision in this case.

The Court’s thirteen (13)-page Decision directed the respondents to “(a) disclose where James Balao is detained or confined, (b) to release James Balao considering his unlawful detention since his abduction and (c) to cease and desist from further inflicting harm upon his person.” In reaching this Decision the Court found that James Balao disappeared because of his “activist/political leanings.” The Court also chided respondents for its “very limited, superficial, and one-sided” investigation on James Balao’s enforced disappearance, and for using “technicalities and evidentiary jargon to thwart [the] Petition to surface the activist.”

Equally important, in an unprecedented move, the Court has recognized the need for President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to respond to a petition for the issuance of a writ of amparo. The Court brilliantly supported this tack on the President’s own duty to be informed of the goings-on around her and to enforce the rule of law. This ruling of the Court provides substance to the otherwise empty statement that “no one is above the law.” By this Decision the President can be held accountable for every case of human rights abuse, especially enforced disappearances, even simply on the level of ensuring the reappearance of the disappeared.

Through its independence and commitment to the rule of law, the Court has pinned the responsibility for James Balao’s disappearance and reappearance upon President Arroyo and her cohorts.

However, the fight is not over. The bottom line is we need to find James Balao. We thus deplore the Court’s ruling to deny the interim reliefs prayed for, especially the issuance of an inspection order. An inspection order would have saved much time and effort in locating James Balao. Still, we are hopeful that the process of executing the Decision pending appeal, with all ancillary reliefs, would reverse an otherwise empty victory. The Court has found – and rightly so – that James Balao is in the hands of the Respondents. The Court must exercise its vast powers so that justice be done though the mighty respondents fall. As the Court has rightfully quoted,

The tribunals are the palladium of the civil liberties of the people. They are the sanctuary where the fundamental human rights are safeguarded. Shall we fail in the crucial hours of actual test? Shall we disappoint the unfortunate victim? This is the last asylum where the victim can resort to. Shall we reject him with freezing indifference? Here comes for salvation a drowning man. Shall we throw him to his doom? From the deepest bottom of our souls surges a powerful No, as an overpowering answer. No. We cannot do that. We must protect the victim. It is our unavoidable duty. It is an imperative mandate of the conscience.

National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers
CAR Chapter

IMPORTANT NOTICE: INBOX is an archive of press releases, statements, announcements, letters to the editors, and manifestos sent to PinoyPress for publication. Please email your materials to pinoypress @ gmail.com. PinoyPress is not responsible for the content of these materials. The opinion expessed in these items does not reflect those of PinoyPress and its staff. Please refer to our terms of use/disclaimer.

  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Ping.fm
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
RELATED STORIES

World Churches, IP Groups Urge Authorities to ‘Surface’ Missing Activist

James Balao: Still Missing Almost 200 Days On

Two Peasant Organizers in Bataan Still Missing

LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES
Reds seek activation of NPA hit squads in cities
After Ampatuan Massacre, 2009 a Record Year for Journalist Killings Worldwide
CHR to military: Respect and protect human rights during martial law in Maguindanao
Maguindanao, its political elite and a culture subservient to corruption
U.S. Must Improve Responsiveness to Mass Atrocities; Absent UN Action, Make Clear Willingness to Act on Its Own, Says New CFR Report
Martial law dilutes the Philippines’s human rights and democratic gains
Martial law in Maguindanao sets ‘most dangerous precedent’
Lawyers will wear black armbands, ribbons in courts
Law group shall file plunder cases against President Arroyo et al.
UN Experts: Maguindanao massacre must be the start of a major reform process
What do you think of the Ampatuan Massacre?
MUST-READS
Arroyo’s oil-price control a publicity stunt, cries Ibon
Political Bloodbath Continues: Widow of Slain Activist Shot Dead
New Wave of Protests Against Charter Change Set in April
Comelec’s Automation to Worsen Election Fraud — Watchdog
2008: Another Bad Year for the Philippine Press
‘Unemployment Figures Wrong; Number of Jobless Higher’
‘Nicole Is Not the Enemy’
‘Nicole’: ‘My Conscience Bothers Me’

USEFUL STORIES
Is the Call Center Industry a Bright Spot for New Graduates?
6 Great Ways to Vent Your Frustrations
Eating Dirt Is Actually Good For Children
Australia Offers 150 Scholarship Slots for Philippines, Asia-Pacific

RECENT COMMENTS
Here’s why oil companies are scared shitless of EO 839 (1 Comments)
    mamert dolera: The horrible maguindanao massacre displays the “crueltiest 221; act of political warlordism...
‘Buko’ Juice from Aromatic Coconuts Gets Boost (11 Comments)
    Don Untalan: I am also interested to buy (AROD) and the tall hybreed variety. Pls advice where to buy from Manila,...
Why I Prayed for Pacquiao’s Defeat  (10 Comments)
    scott: Sports and politics do not mix. But the economy of the Philippines relies on Pacqiao. How much money would a...
Arroyo Signs Adoption Law That Gives More Teeth to DSWD (9 Comments)
    Bernadine Ebo: nov.11,2009 4:45 my husband and i wants to adopt
LATEST NEWS FROM DAVAOTODAY.COM
LATEST NEWS FROM BULATLAT.COM
LATEST TECH POSTS FROM BROADBANDSUCKS.COM
Back to Main Page | About PinoyPress | Contact Us | Advertise | Archives | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits
Copyright © 2008 PinoyPress | Manila, Philippines | Hosting & design by Web Host Philippines