3. Jonas Burgos Case
(1) Abduction
On April 28, Jonas Joseph Burgos was abducted by three men and a woman from the Ever Gotesco Mall on Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. He remains missing. He is the son of the late publisher Jose “Joe” Burgos, a known press freedom fighter during the Marcos regime. Burgos, a member of the leftist Peasants’ Movement of the Philippines, had conducted a farming seminar on the day he disappeared. He was later to meet family members but never showed up and did not answer calls to his mobile phone. To date, Burgos’ abduction is the most high-profile in a series of attacks on left-wing activists.
The Army was linked to the abduction after the license plate of a Toyota Revo into which Burgos was bundled was traced to a jeep seized in 2006 by a joint team from the Army and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and since then has been parked inside the Army’s 56th Infantry Battalion in Norzagaray, Bulacan.
Despite an order from the Supreme Court, the military has failed to produce the missing activist, insisting that communist rebels, not soldiers, were involved in the abduction.
(2) Investigation
On July 9, 2007, Senior state prosecutor Emmanuel Velasco head of the panel investigating the disappearance of Jonas Burgos ordered an investigation of military intelligence agents and two other officers suspected of involvement in the abduction. He clearly pointed out that the military were involved with the abduction.
Velasco had asked the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to investigate (1) Army Technical Sergeant Jason Roxas, (2) Air Force Corporal Maria Joana Francisco, (3) Air Force Master Sergeant Aron Arroyo (PAF), and (4) a certain alias T.L., all detailed with the Military Intelligence Group (MIG) 15 of the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (ISAFP); (5) Army 1st Lieutenant Jaime Mendaro, reportedly assigned to the 56th IB; and (6) Lieutenant Colonel Noel Clement, formerly of the 56th Infantry Battalion and presently assigned with the Escort and Security Battalion of the Philippine Army at Fort Bonifacio.
They were summoned for questioning on the basis of the allegation of the informant that he has seen them at the crime scene when Burgos was forcibly taken.
However, he was relieved on July 11, two days after the issuance of his abovementioned order, by Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez as head of the panel investigating the disappearance of the Burgos case. 122
(3) Current Status
In December 2007, the Court of Appeals has issues a writ of amparo in the case of Jonas Burgos, a day after his mother filed a petition for amparo to get the military to account for Burgos’ disappearance. The appellate court ordered the respondents, led by Armed Forces Chief General Hermogenes Esperon, to file a return, or an official report in response to the writ in five days. To date, however, Mr. Burgos has not yet released.
Ⅶ Impunity
The UN Special Rapportuer Mr. Alston recommended that a significant number of convictions in the case of extrajudicial killings should be achieved. To do so, he recommended that the Supreme Court, Commission on Human Rights and Task Force USIG issue monthly reports of the status of cases of extrajudicial killings.123
HRN is in the same view as Mr. Alston. In order to restore justice and prevent future human rights violations, a significant number of convictions must be achieved based on thorough investigation of the extrajudicial killings.
However, while the Task Force USIG reported there are several convictions on the killing of media people, local human rights group claims that no single conviction has been achieved regarding the extrajudicial killings.124
HRN has not seen any monthly report publicly issued by the Supreme Court, Commission on Human Rights and Task Force USIG in terms of their activity on extrajudicial killings after Mr. Alston’s recommendation.125 At least, HRN is aware that there is no conviction on the cases that the HRN fact-finding mission investigated. As a result, the perpetrators enjoy impunity.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
RSS feed • Subscribe via email • Discuss
Hebeegat: Hello! Did you close the comments section at http://www.pinoypress.net/2008 /08/09/do-ateneans-own-kati...
Suckeronie: This totally sucks!
Mary Rhoda Fe: HI, Im rhoda from davao city philippines. I want to study in college and my 4 other sisters and 2...
lorraine partosa,md: …then to top it off, you get uber-WEIRD columns like these to rub everything that’s...
Matt: the Government should launch massive attack once and for all.. finish all MILF.. nothing should remain
Smith: It is a nice post about awareness of AIDS and how we cure the problem of AIDS. Its very helpful article....
The New Settlers: Mindanao Muslims Head North 08:13 am
Waiting Game for North Cotabato Refugees 08:09 am
RSF Calls for More Energetic Inquiry Into Murders of Philippine Journalists 08:07 am
Lanao del Norte Atrocities Exposed MILF’s Weakness 07:21 pm
Strong Tobacco Lobby Bedevils New Law Vs Smoking 08:37 am
Lanao del Norte Atrocities Exposed MILF’s Weakness
Strong Tobacco Lobby Bedevils New Law Vs Smoking
Katipunan Redux
Being PC
Dirty McDo
April 9th, 2008 at 6:31 am
i guess you should allow re-print of your articles. that way, you can help in our socio-awareness campaign. should you find an outlet for re-printing selected materials, please advise at therizalweeklypost@gmail.com.ph
May 3rd, 2008 at 4:12 am
Tunay na NPA ang mga napatay sa Mindoro. Hindi nyo ba natanong kung ano nangyari sa mindoro pagkatapos ng patayan na to? TUMAHIMIK po ang mindoro. Nung panahon ng mga NPA sila ang naghahari dito. Basta hindi nila ninain.siguardo patay ka. Pero ni wala kaming narinig na human rights violations. Pero nung binaligtad ang laro at sila ang pinatay, kaliwa’t kanan ang sigaw ng pang-abuso sa karapatang pantao. Kayong mga mangilan ngilan na maiingay lang mas magandang tumahimik kayo. Wala na bang puwang ang kapayapaan sa inyo? Sana matuto naman kayong mamuhay ng mapayapa.