Without a doubt, the story of Brian Gorrell, the Australian whose blog is taking the Internet by storm (at least in the Philippines), is becoming a test case on libel and defamation in the age of new media. Although Gorrell insists that what he writes in his blog is only the truth, many agree that its content is libelous and defamatory.
Not surprisingly, the mainstream press, including PinoyPress, handled Gorrell’s story gingerly, to put it mildly. A major consideration is the fact that Gorrell has not filed any case in court. If he did — and he promised to PinoyPress that he would — it would have made his case public and, as such, would have given the mainstream press the reason (or justification?) not just to write about it but also to identify those involved. That most of them did not points to the delicate nature of Gorrell’s case.
Then again, should the filing of an actual case transform Gorrell’s story from mere gossip into a legitimate news story?
Here again the press is accused of being selective in its application of journalistic ethics and the legal principles surrounding libel and defamation. Is the mainstream press, the allegation goes, too careful (or too afraid?) in Gorrell’s case because those whom he accused of various sins and malfeasance are powerful and famous people – people who have the means to haul journalists off to court? On the other hand, what can the public make of the fact that the press has no qualms identifying and exposing people, often poor and powerless, accused – as opposed to guilty — of theft or rape?
Can the members of so-called high-society that have been boldfaced in Gorrell’s blog invoke privacy, even if, by definition, a socialite necessarily lives a very public life? You see them in the society pages, flaunting their wealth, influence and, often, decadence and insinuating themselves into the public consciousness – doesn’t that make them public figures and, as such, fair game to the press and the new media? Gorrell himself has asked this question several times.
To help our readers understand the other issues related to Gorrell’s blog, PinoyPress sent out three questions to seven journalists and media experts. Only two of them responded.
JV Rufino is the editor-in-chief of Inquirer.net, the online news site owned by the same folks that own the Philippine Daily Inquirer. The website and the paper were the first to run stories on Gorrell. (They have so far written the most number of stories on the Australian. On Monday, the story finally landed on the paper’s front page.)
Danilo Arao is a journalism professor at the University of the Philippines. He is considered one of the pioneering online journalists in the country and has written for various publications. He writes a weekly column for Pinoy Weekly and helps put out the Philippine Journalism Review.
RSS feed • Subscribe via email • Discuss
You must be logged in to post a comment.
More Civilian Suffering Feared in Mindanao
Presence of US Troops in Mindanao Faces Probe
Looking Forward in Mindanao
Arroyo Dissolves Gov’t Peace Panel
Major US Gov’t Report Concludes Tobacco’s Media Promotion Leads to Smoking
Manila’s Censorship Law Rears Its Ugly Head
The New Settlers: Mindanao Muslims Head North
Waiting Game for North Cotabato Refugees
Lanao del Norte Atrocities Exposed MILF’s Weakness
The MOA, the Cha-Cha, and the US Ambassador
Green Group Denounces ANZ for OceanaGold Denial
Growth of Software Development Outsourcing to Drive Related Industries
Record 6,533 to Take Philippine Bar Exams
NGOs Urge Transparency in IRR Crafting of Cheaper Medicines Law
US Anti-Tobacco Group Hails Philip Morris’s Withdrawal from Eraserheads Concert
April 8th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
[...] also used my emailed reply to CC Hidalgo in the article titled “Why the Philippine Press Is Too Careful in Handling Brian Gorrell Case (April 7).” If you want to know my views on the Brian Gorrell case (particularly how [...]
April 19th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Brian is a social climber himself and tried to live the easy, good life while in Manila and Boracay. He was trying really hard to make friends with the Gucci Gang, and hoped to be one of them.
They, of course, rejected him in the end which is why he is so bitter.
I do believe DJ did take his money, though. But why Brian was so stupid as to just blindly send his life savings is his own stupidity.
But really, saving for your whole life and all you have is $70,000? That’s really pathetic. Brian is almost 40 years old.
That’s the problem with these gold diggers from outside. They offer nothing but HIV, but expect to live like a king because they are white and in the Philippines.
I have no sympathy for white opportunist trash like Brian. Good riddance!
May 2nd, 2008 at 1:21 am
Excuse me, but what are the “very serious allegations” brought by Mr. Gorell against the Gucci Gang? I can maybe see a fraud charge against Montano, but what has the Gucci Gang done wrong? Drugs? That would require a police investigations with charges of posession, intent to sell, etc. Otherwise, I dont see anything in Gorell’s blog about criminal activity.
I don’t even understand how this is a legitimate news story. At best, it deserves mention in the gossip/entertainment section. The unverified one-sided rantings of a spurned lover constitutes hard news? Please take a long hard look at your journalistic standards.