FBI Should Revive Probe of Alleged Perpetrators Promoted by Hun Sen
(New York, March 30, 2008) – The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) should reopen its long-stalled investigation into the grisly grenade attack on an opposition party rally in Phnom Penh 11 years ago that left at least 16 dead and more than 150 injured, Human Rights Watch said today. The FBI investigation, which made significant progress in 1997, has been effectively abandoned.
On March 30, 1997, a crowd of approximately 200 supporters of the opposition Khmer Nation Party (KNP), led by former Finance Minister Sam Rainsy, gathered in a park across the street from the National Assembly to denounce the judiciary’s corruption and lack of independence. In a well-planned attack, four grenades were thrown into the crowd, killing protesters and bystanders, including children, and tearing limbs off street vendors. The grenade attack made headlines and provoked outrage around the world. On June 29, 1997, the Washington Post wrote:
“In a classified report that could pose some awkward problems for U.S. policymakers, the FBI tentatively has pinned responsibility for the blasts, and the subsequent interference, on personal bodyguard forces employed by Hun Sen, one of Cambodia’s two prime ministers, according to four U.S. government sources familiar with its contents. The preliminary report was based on a two-month investigation by FBI agents sent here under a federal law giving the bureau jurisdiction whenever a U.S. citizen is injured by terrorism. … The bureau says its investigation is continuing, but the agents involved reportedly have complained that additional informants here are too frightened to come forward.”
“The FBI was close to solving the case when its lead investigator was suddenly ordered out of the country by the US ambassador, Kenneth Quinn,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The FBI has damning evidence in its files that suggests that Prime Minister Hun Sen ordered the attack, but it has refused to fully cooperate with congressional inquiries or follow through on its initial investigation. Instead of trying to protect US relations with Cambodia, it should now finish what it started.”
The FBI investigated the attack because Ron Abney, a US citizen, was seriously injured in the blast, which the United States at the time deemed to be an “act of terrorism.” Abney had to be evacuated to Singapore to treat shrapnel wounds in his hip.
Instead of launching a serious investigation, then co-Prime Minister Hun Sen announced that the demonstration’s organizers should be arrested and instructed police not to allow them to leave the country. (To read an Agence France-Presse account published at the time, please visit: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/28/cambod13086.htm).
On the day of the attack, Hun Sen’s personal bodyguard unit, Brigade-70 (B-70), was, for the first time, deployed at a demonstration. Photographs show them in full riot gear. The police, which had in the past maintained a high-profile presence at opposition demonstrations to discourage public participation, had an unusually low profile on that day. Officers were grouped around the corner from the park, having been ordered to stay away from the park itself. Also for the first time, the KNP had received official permission from both the Ministry of the Interior and the Phnom Penh municipality to hold a demonstration, fuelling speculation that the demonstration was authorized so it could be attacked.
Numerous eyewitnesses reported that the persons who had thrown the grenades were seen running toward Hun Sen’s bodyguards, who were deployed in a line at the west end of the park near the guarded residential compound containing the homes of many senior Cambodia People’s Party leaders. Witnesses told United Nations and FBI investigators that the bodyguard line opened to allow the grenade-throwers to escape into the compound. Meanwhile, people in the crowd pursuing the grenade-throwers were stopped by the bodyguards at gunpoint and told they would be shot if they did not retreat.
“This brazen attack, carried out in broad daylight, ingrained impunity more than any other single act in recent Cambodian history,” said Adams. “But that appears to have been one of its purposes – to send the message that opposition supporters can be murdered without anyone facing justice.”
Pages: 1 2
RSS feed • Subscribe via email • Discuss
Indonesia’s Experience Debunks Claim of JPEPA Gains 03:50 pm
Probe Eyed on Banks’ Outsourcing 03:20 pm
More Flaws in P5-Billion Loan to Quedancor Bared 07:32 am
Arroyo Dissolves Gov’t Peace Panel 01:21 pm
Major US Gov’t Report Concludes Tobacco’s Media Promotion Leads to Smoking 11:16 am
Manila’s Censorship Law Rears Its Ugly Head 08:44 pm
The New Settlers: Mindanao Muslims Head North 08:13 am
Waiting Game for North Cotabato Refugees 08:09 am
Lanao del Norte Atrocities Exposed MILF’s Weakness 07:21 pm
The MOA, the Cha-Cha, and the US Ambassador 07:40 am
NGOs Urge Transparency in IRR Crafting of Cheaper Medicines Law 03:43 pm
US Anti-Tobacco Group Hails Philip Morris’s Withdrawal from Eraserheads Concert 11:24 am
‘Disarm, Dismantle Ilaga Vigilantes Now,’ Solon Dares Arroyo 06:54 pm
Health Advocates Hail Pullout of Philip Morris from Eraserheads Concert 04:23 pm
Moro Youth Leaders Push for Peace and Justice 08:15 am
Leave a Comment