MANILA — Local dailies reported that Lafayette Philippines, Inc. , a Philippine subsidiary of Lafayette Mining Ltd., an Australian firm operating the controversial Rapurapu Polymetallic Project, filed libel raps against the Center for Environmental Concerns – Philippines (CEC – Phils). Among the statements that Lafayette was said to deem libelous were our assertions that the company “engaged in the illicit sale of the Philippine natural resources, had been deceitful in reporting its production, epitomized irresponsible mining, and had caused fish kills and various ailments in the community.”
Let it be known, that we from the CEC – Phils are most ready to face the charges, and at this point, already plead not guilty. We stand by our statements, duly-supported as they are by no less than the findings of the Rapu-Rapu Fact-Finding Commission (RRFFC), which President Arroyo herself convened following public outrage.
In our campaign against the polymetallic project in Rapu-rapu, we have always referred to the RRFFC’s findings and recommendations to support our calls to stop the mining operations in the island. In fact, it was the RRFFC which noted that Lafayette’s project epitomized irresponsible mining and greed for profit – as shown in their violation of 10 of 29 conditions of its Environmental Compliance Certificate to environmental laws, anomalies in their tax payments, and more importantly, their insensitivity to the suffering of the Rapu-rapu folk, who continue to live in extreme poverty.
Naturally, Lafayette did not attempt to sue the RRFFC. Instead, it was keen on harassing us, a non-government organization which promotes people-oriented, patriotic, scientific, progressive and sustainable environmental advocacy. We had earned their ire for showing sound scientific evidence of the destructive impact of mining operations in Rapu-rapu, including geophysical characteristics of the island which render it a high-risk area for mining. Moreover, studies of the Institute for Environmental Conservation and Research, and of AGHAM (Advocates of Science and Technology for the People), reveal that Rapu-rapu has a fragile ecosystem with hilly terrains and steep slopes, and massive sulfide rocks capable of generating sulfuric acid. Also, Rapu-rapu is vulnerable to landslide due to loosened soil and tailings resulting from the mining project.
Hence, amid the efforts of Lafayette to clear its otherwise ugly name, we shall continue to condemn transnational mining corporations who exploit the country’s mineral resources, at the expense of the people and the environment. Finally, we will continue to condemn the principal authors of the Mining Act of 1995 and their cohorts in the DENR, who have allowed the plunder of our natural resources and the sale of our national patrimony.
We welcome the said libel suit, and we see it as an opportunity to continue exposing the consequences of destructive mining in Rapu-rapu that the government, neglected when it allowed the company to resume operations.
Lafayette’s legal efforts cannot thwart us. Instead, we are all the more inspired to fight for the people and the environment. Together with the Filipino people, the Center for Environmental Concerns shall continue to struggle for a mining policy that will truly benefit the Filipino people and support national progress.###
IMPORTANT NOTICE: INBOX is an archive of press releases, statements, announcements, letters to the editors, and manifestos sent to PinoyPress for publication. Please email your materials to pinoypress @ gmail.com. PinoyPress is not responsible for the content of these materials. The opinion expessed in these items does not reflect those of PinoyPress and its staff. Please refer to our terms of use/disclaimer.
RSS feed • Subscribe via email • Discuss
Bong: While you’re at it, check mo na din kaya ang minutes ng hearings ng Congress at Senate prior to crafting...
rOniLyn: we will be having our tv talk show.. and it’s all about the System Education here in the...
Firefly: I agree wholeheartedly moolah. Amidst all this crap going on, it’s the one question that’s in...
moolah: Dear Caloy, I’m sorry if people, particularly Eheads fans (or so they say), are quick to dispute the...
Baby Idol: What’s wrong with those people who are trying to stop this event. No other corporation can bring...
jvee: i don’t care about your words mr. carlos conde. we are old enough to know what is left or what is...
Eraserheads Concert: Who’s Wagging the Dog? 08:47 pm
In Marketing Strategy, Tobacco Company Behind Eraserheads Concert Targets Teens 01:32 pm
Here’s Why Eraserheads Reunion Concert Could Be in Trouble 11:12 pm
Ninotchka Rosca: The Usual Can Be Criminal 08:58 am
Mindanao Radio Host Shot, Now in Coma 08:48 am
Anti-Tobacco Advocates Ask Eraserheads to Reject Tobacco Sponsorship of Concert 08:59 pm
Movement Launched Vs Tobacco-Sponsored Eraserheads Reunion Concert 09:35 am
Fr. Shay Cullen: End Sex Tourism and Restore Filipino Dignity 08:51 am
50 Cent Text Rate Arbitrarily Set, Should Be Made Permanent; Real Price May Be Lower 09:36 pm
US Group Urges Probe of ‘Sponsorship’ of Eraserheads Concert 02:29 pm
Mindanao Radio Host Shot, Now in Coma
Bangsamoro Homeland: A Long Way to Go
‘Festival of Lies’: Thousands Protest SONA
Arroyo Fails to Meet Own Targets — Study
‘Amparo Dismissals Encourage More Killings’
9 of 10 Metro Residents Want Oil VAT Scrapped
Eraserheads Concert: Who’s Wagging the Dog?
Eraserheads Reunion Concert: Asterisked
US Group Urges Probe of ‘Sponsorship’ of Eraserheads Concert
Eraserheads Should Disclose Concert Sponsor
Caught in Big Tobacco’s Web
Survey Shows Online Advertising Is Less Effective Than TV Advertising in Asia
Leave a Comment