Saudi Arabie: An appeal to Muslim scholars throughout the world

(The case of a teenage girl facing the death sentence in Saudi Arabia
as the result of a tragedy being misunderstood as a crime)

The Asian Human Rights Commission is writing this appeal to all the
Muslim scholars in the world regarding the case that the AHRC
believes deserves of all Muslim scholars.

This is a case where a teenage girl, who was in charge of bottle
feeding a four-month old child, which due to her inexperience
resulted in an accident of the child choking and while she was
desperately trying to help by way of soothing and stroking the chest,
face and neck of the baby a tragic death took place. These
circumstances are explained below. However, due to misunderstandings
this case was presented as the murder of a baby by strangulation and
the teenager was sentenced to death by a court in Saudi Arabia on
June, 16.

After careful consideration of all facts we are of the view that what
has happened is an enormous tragedy but it can lead to, if not
prevented soon, a further tragedy of an innocent inexperienced
teenager being executed.

We believe that this is a case in which scholarly considerations can
help to make the necessary reflections distinguishing a tragedy from
a crime and from such reflections interventions can be made to
prevent a further tragedy taking place. We believe that the Muslim
scholars, if they think it appropriate can communicate with this
unfortunate family, faced with this situation to provide them with
wise advise to help them deal with this issue.

Details of the relevant incidents:

This case concerns Naffeek Rizana who is facing the death sentence in
Saudi Arabia, allegedly for the strangulation of a four month old
baby. Through close study of the case the Asian Human Rights
Commission is satisfied that, in fact, what has taken place was the
tragic death of a baby in the process of being fed by an
inexperienced teenager.

Naffeek Rizana was born on February 4, 1988 and comes from a
war-torn, impoverished village. Here, many families, including those
of the Muslim community try to send their under aged children for
employment outside the country, as their breadwinners. Some
employment agencies exploit the situation of the impoverished
families to recruit under aged girls for employment. For that purpose
they engage in obtaining passports by altering the dates of birth of
these children to make it appear that they are older than they really
are. In the case of Naffeek Rizana, the altered date, which is to be
found in her passport now, is February 2, 1982. It was on the basis
of this altered date that the employment agency fixed her employment
in Saudi Arabia and she went there in May, 2005.

Later in 2007 she went to work at the house of Mr. Naif Jiziyan
Khklafal Otaibi whose wife had a new-born baby boy. A short time
after she started working for this family she was assigned to bottle
feed the infant who was by then four months old. Naffeek Rizana had
no experience of any sort in caring for such a young infant. She was
left alone when bottle feeding the child. While she was feeding the
child the boy started choking, as so often happens to babies and
Naffeek Rizana panicked and while shouting for help tried to sooth
the child by feeling the chest, neck and face, doing whatever she
could to help him. At her shouting the mother arrived but by that
time the baby was either unconscious or dead. Unfortunately,
misunderstanding the situation the family members treated the
teenager very harshly and handed her over to the police, accusing her
of strangling the baby. At the police station also, she was very
harshly handled and did not have the help of a translator or anyone
else to whom she could explain what had happened. She was made to
sign a confession and later charges were filed in court of murder by
strangulation.

On her first appearance in court she was sternly warned by the police
to repeat her confession, which she did. However, later she was able
to talk to an interpreter who was sent by the Sri Lankan embassy and
she explained in her own language the circumstances of what had
happened as stated above. This version was also stated in court
thereafter.

According to reports, the judges who heard the case requested the
father of the child to use his prerogative to pardon the young girl.
However, the father refused to grant such pardon. On that basis the
court sentenced her to death by beheading. This sentence was made on
June 16, 2007.

There is a period of one month for the lodging of an appeal. However,
an appeal has not yet been lodged. The initiative for lodging the
appeal is with the Sri Lankan government. The AHRC also understands
that the Sri Lankan authorities have sought the help of a legal firm
which had initially demanded the equivalent of US$ 160,000. In the
initially reports in the media there were different figures quoted.
However, this matter has now been clarified. The Foreign Ministry in
Colombo, Sri Lanka has not authorised such money and the family of
Naffeek Rizana is of course unable to raise any funds for her appeal.
This matter of legal assistance is being pursued with the government
at the moment.

However, under Saudi Arabian law it is the prerogative of the family
of the victim, in this case the parents of the baby that has the
right to pardon the teenaged, Naffeek Rizana. Such pardon will be
valid in law under the Saudi Arabian legal system.

The Asian Human Rights Commission is of the view that was has
happened is a tragedy and not a crime. At no stage was any allegation
made of any animosity between the teenaged helper and the family. If
such animosity existed it is very unlikely that a four month old
infant would have been handed over to her care. The inexperience of
the helper, as well as the difficulties of communication due to the
language problems have ended up in an extremely unfortunate situation
being misunderstood as a crime. If the nature of this tragedy is not
dealt with within a matter of days from now there will be a further
tragedy of a teenaged, inexperienced helper being given capital
punishment for a crime she did not commit or intend to commit.

Contact details of the family:

Those scholars who wish to offer their advice to the family may do so
through the following address c/o the Sri Lankan Embassy in Riyadh,
Saudi Arabia.

Mr. Naif Jiziyan Khklafal Otaibi
Ministry of Finance, Riyadh
C/O Sri Lankan Embassy
P.O. Box 94360
Riyadh 19693
Saudi Arabia

lankaemb@shabahap.net ,
amjsadiqu@hotmail.com

For a sample letter written by the Asian Human Rights Commission to
the family please see below:

Dear Mr. Otaibi,

May the peace of God be upon you during this time of grief in your
family. I wish to express my heartfelt condolences to you and your
wife over the loss of your child.

The loss of any life is a tragedy, and it is in this spirit that I
share with you my concerns for the life of the teenage girl Naffeek
Rizana.

Naffeek Rizana comes from an extremely poor family in the war-torn
eastern part of Sri Lanka where many people, including the Muslim
community, are facing grave economic and other daily hardships. Due
to this, many underage young people are sent to other countries for
employment in order to feed their impoverished families.

Naffeek Rizana was born on February 4, 1988. The individuals who
recruited her for employment in your country altered her date of
birth to February 2, 1982, and obtained a passport for her to travel
to Saudi Arabia. At the time of her employment in your household, she
was therefore still a teenager without any experience of looking after
a baby. My understanding is that her inexperience resulted in the
accidental death of your child and that this was not an intentional
act to harm your family.

I am therefore writing this letter to appeal to your compassion to
pardon and forgive the teenage girl Naffeek Rizana who is now facing
a death sentence. It is to your compassion and understanding that I
appeal in the hope that you will find it in your heart to forgive
this unfortunate girl.

Yours sincerely,

# # #

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights
issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

—————————————————
To unsubscribe from this list visit
http://internal.ahrchk.net/phplist/?p=unsubscribe&uid=b2e23d84d4b7b93b7a39c21fa03d43f0
To update your preferences visit
http://internal.ahrchk.net/phplist/?p=preferences&uid=b2e23d84d4b7b93b7a39c21fa03d43f0
—————————————————

Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) - 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) - 2698-6367

IMPORTANT NOTICE: INBOX is an archive of press releases, statements, announcements, letters to the editors, and manifestos sent to PinoyPress for publication. Please email your materials to pinoypress @ gmail.com. PinoyPress is not responsible for the content of these materials. The opinion expessed in these items does not reflect those of PinoyPress and its staff. Please refer to our terms of use/disclaimer.